Volkswagen Tiguan vs Ford Explorer Insurance Cost
The Volkswagen Tiguan is cheaper to insure by about $35 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,365 vs. $1,400), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Volkswagen Tiguan | Ford Explorer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $570 | $550 | +$20 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $830 | $800 | +$30 |
| Full coverage | $1,365 | $1,400 | −$35 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Tiguan minus Explorer.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Volkswagen Tiguan | Ford Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Midsize SUV | Midsize SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline | Gasoline, Hybrid, Flex-fuel |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 72 | 85 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 72 | 81 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 88 | 84 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 100 | 92 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 3 | 29 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Ford Explorer has 13 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
Tiguan vs Explorer insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Tiguan | Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $3,750 | $3,850 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,180 | $2,240 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,365 | $1,400 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,255 | $1,290 |
| Senior (72) | $1,525 | $1,570 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $1,975 | $2,030 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,520 | $2,590 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Volkswagen Tiguan or the Ford Explorer cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Volkswagen Tiguan is cheaper, by about $35 a year for full coverage ($1,365 vs. $1,400) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Volkswagen Tiguan and Ford Explorer?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 72 vs. 85 and comprehensive indices of 72 vs. 81 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.