Nissan Murano vs Ford Explorer Insurance Cost

The Ford Explorer is cheaper to insure by about $65 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,465 vs. $1,400), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageNissan MuranoFord ExplorerDifference
State minimum$565$550+$15
Standard (100/300/100)$820$800+$20
Full coverage$1,465$1,400+$65

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Murano minus Explorer.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorNissan MuranoFord Explorer
SegmentMidsize SUVMidsize SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline, Hybrid, Flex-fuel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)9085
HLDI comprehensive9081
HLDI property damage liability8484
HLDI bodily injury liability10192
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)229

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Murano has 5 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Murano vs Explorer insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverMuranoExplorer
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,020$3,850
Young adult (22)$2,340$2,240
Adult in their 30s$1,465$1,400
Adult in their 50s$1,345$1,290
Senior (72)$1,640$1,570
30s, one at-fault accident$2,120$2,030
30s, DUI on record$2,705$2,590

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Nissan Murano or the Ford Explorer cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Explorer is cheaper, by about $65 a year for full coverage ($1,465 vs. $1,400) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Nissan Murano and Ford Explorer?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 90 vs. 85 and comprehensive indices of 90 vs. 81 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.