Ford Explorer vs Buick Enclave Insurance Cost

The Ford Explorer is cheaper to insure by about $130 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,400 vs. $1,530), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageFord ExplorerBuick EnclaveDifference
State minimum$550$605−$55
Standard (100/300/100)$800$880−$80
Full coverage$1,400$1,530−$130

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Explorer minus Enclave.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorFord ExplorerBuick Enclave
SegmentMidsize SUVMidsize SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Flex-fuelGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)8597
HLDI comprehensive8182
HLDI property damage liability84108
HLDI bodily injury liability9295
NHTSA overall rating5★—
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)291

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Buick Enclave has 12 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Explorer vs Enclave insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverExplorerEnclave
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,850$4,215
Young adult (22)$2,240$2,450
Adult in their 30s$1,400$1,530
Adult in their 50s$1,290$1,410
Senior (72)$1,570$1,715
30s, one at-fault accident$2,030$2,220
30s, DUI on record$2,590$2,835

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ford Explorer or the Buick Enclave cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Explorer is cheaper, by about $130 a year for full coverage ($1,400 vs. $1,530) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Ford Explorer and Buick Enclave?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 85 vs. 97 and comprehensive indices of 81 vs. 82 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.