Ford Explorer vs Nissan Pathfinder Insurance Cost

The Ford Explorer is cheaper to insure by about $55 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,400 vs. $1,455), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageFord ExplorerNissan PathfinderDifference
State minimum$550$595−$45
Standard (100/300/100)$800$865−$65
Full coverage$1,400$1,455−$55

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Explorer minus Pathfinder.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorFord ExplorerNissan Pathfinder
SegmentMidsize SUVMidsize SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Flex-fuelGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)8587
HLDI comprehensive8185
HLDI property damage liability8492
HLDI bodily injury liability92109
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)293

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Pathfinder has 2 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Explorer vs Pathfinder insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverExplorerPathfinder
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,850$4,005
Young adult (22)$2,240$2,330
Adult in their 30s$1,400$1,455
Adult in their 50s$1,290$1,340
Senior (72)$1,570$1,630
30s, one at-fault accident$2,030$2,110
30s, DUI on record$2,590$2,695

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ford Explorer or the Nissan Pathfinder cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Explorer is cheaper, by about $55 a year for full coverage ($1,400 vs. $1,455) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 85 vs. 87 and comprehensive indices of 81 vs. 85 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.