Toyota Corolla vs Nissan Versa Insurance Cost

The Toyota Corolla is cheaper to insure by about $120 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,705 vs. $1,825), and cheaper in 49 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageToyota CorollaNissan VersaDifference
State minimum$710$820−$110
Standard (100/300/100)$1,025$1,185−$160
Full coverage$1,705$1,825−$120

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Corolla minus Versa.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorToyota CorollaNissan Versa
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)102115
HLDI comprehensive8973
HLDI property damage liability114128
HLDI bodily injury liability137183
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)31

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Versa has 13 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Nissan Versa.

Corolla vs Versa insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCorollaVersa
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,695$5,010
Young adult (22)$2,730$2,915
Adult in their 30s$1,705$1,825
Adult in their 50s$1,570$1,675
Senior (72)$1,910$2,040
30s, one at-fault accident$2,475$2,645
30s, DUI on record$3,155$3,370

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Toyota Corolla or the Nissan Versa cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota Corolla is cheaper, by about $120 a year for full coverage ($1,705 vs. $1,825) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Toyota Corolla and Nissan Versa?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 102 vs. 115 and comprehensive indices of 89 vs. 73 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.