Toyota Corolla vs Kia Forte Insurance Cost

The Toyota Corolla is cheaper to insure by about $250 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,705 vs. $1,955), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageToyota CorollaKia ForteDifference
State minimum$710$860−$150
Standard (100/300/100)$1,025$1,245−$220
Full coverage$1,705$1,955−$250

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Corolla minus Forte.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorToyota CorollaKia Forte
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)102128
HLDI comprehensive89108
HLDI property damage liability114141
HLDI bodily injury liability137188
NHTSA overall rating5★4★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)34

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Kia Forte has 26 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Toyota Corolla.

Corolla vs Forte insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCorollaForte
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,695$5,380
Young adult (22)$2,730$3,130
Adult in their 30s$1,705$1,955
Adult in their 50s$1,570$1,800
Senior (72)$1,910$2,190
30s, one at-fault accident$2,475$2,835
30s, DUI on record$3,155$3,620

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Toyota Corolla or the Kia Forte cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota Corolla is cheaper, by about $250 a year for full coverage ($1,705 vs. $1,955) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Toyota Corolla and Kia Forte?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 102 vs. 128 and comprehensive indices of 89 vs. 108 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.