Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla Insurance Cost

The Toyota Corolla is cheaper to insure by about $85 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,790 vs. $1,705), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageHonda CivicToyota CorollaDifference
State minimum$730$710+$20
Standard (100/300/100)$1,060$1,025+$35
Full coverage$1,790$1,705+$85

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Civic minus Corolla.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorHonda CivicToyota Corolla
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, CNGGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)121102
HLDI comprehensive8889
HLDI property damage liability125114
HLDI bodily injury liability139137
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rank#5Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)43

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Honda Civic has 19 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Honda Civic appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.

Civic vs Corolla insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCivicCorolla
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,915$4,695
Young adult (22)$2,860$2,730
Adult in their 30s$1,790$1,705
Adult in their 50s$1,645$1,570
Senior (72)$2,000$1,910
30s, one at-fault accident$2,590$2,475
30s, DUI on record$3,305$3,155

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Honda Civic or the Toyota Corolla cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota Corolla is cheaper, by about $85 a year for full coverage ($1,790 vs. $1,705) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 121 vs. 102 and comprehensive indices of 88 vs. 89 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.