Toyota Corolla vs Nissan Leaf Insurance Cost

The Nissan Leaf is cheaper to insure by about $240 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,705 vs. $1,465), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageToyota CorollaNissan LeafDifference
State minimum$710$615+$95
Standard (100/300/100)$1,025$890+$135
Full coverage$1,705$1,465+$240

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Corolla minus Leaf.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorToyota CorollaNissan Leaf
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridElectric
HLDI collision (100 = avg)10296
HLDI comprehensive8957
HLDI property damage liability114104
HLDI bodily injury liability13797
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)32

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Toyota Corolla has 6 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Nissan Leaf.

Corolla vs Leaf insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCorollaLeaf
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,695$4,035
Young adult (22)$2,730$2,345
Adult in their 30s$1,705$1,465
Adult in their 50s$1,570$1,350
Senior (72)$1,910$1,645
30s, one at-fault accident$2,475$2,125
30s, DUI on record$3,155$2,715

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Toyota Corolla or the Nissan Leaf cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Nissan Leaf is cheaper, by about $240 a year for full coverage ($1,705 vs. $1,465) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Toyota Corolla and Nissan Leaf?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 102 vs. 96 and comprehensive indices of 89 vs. 57 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.