Toyota Corolla vs Nissan Sentra Insurance Cost

The Toyota Corolla is cheaper to insure by about $340 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,705 vs. $2,045), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageToyota CorollaNissan SentraDifference
State minimum$710$855−$145
Standard (100/300/100)$1,025$1,240−$215
Full coverage$1,705$2,045−$340

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Corolla minus Sentra.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorToyota CorollaNissan Sentra
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)102132
HLDI comprehensive8991
HLDI property damage liability114140
HLDI bodily injury liability137192
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)35

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Sentra has 30 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Corolla vs Sentra insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCorollaSentra
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,695$5,625
Young adult (22)$2,730$3,270
Adult in their 30s$1,705$2,045
Adult in their 50s$1,570$1,880
Senior (72)$1,910$2,290
30s, one at-fault accident$2,475$2,965
30s, DUI on record$3,155$3,785

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Toyota Corolla or the Nissan Sentra cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota Corolla is cheaper, by about $340 a year for full coverage ($1,705 vs. $2,045) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Toyota Corolla and Nissan Sentra?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 102 vs. 132 and comprehensive indices of 89 vs. 91 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.