Tesla Model Y vs Nissan Murano Insurance Cost

The Nissan Murano is cheaper to insure by about $40 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,505 vs. $1,465), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageTesla Model YNissan MuranoDifference
State minimum$530$565−$35
Standard (100/300/100)$770$820−$50
Full coverage$1,505$1,465+$40

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Model Y minus Murano.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorTesla Model YNissan Murano
SegmentMidsize SUVMidsize SUV
PowertrainsElectricGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)11890
HLDI comprehensive7790
HLDI property damage liability8284
HLDI bodily injury liability83101
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)102

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Tesla Model Y has 28 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Tesla Model Y.

Model Y vs Murano insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverModel YMurano
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,135$4,020
Young adult (22)$2,405$2,340
Adult in their 30s$1,505$1,465
Adult in their 50s$1,385$1,345
Senior (72)$1,685$1,640
30s, one at-fault accident$2,180$2,120
30s, DUI on record$2,780$2,705

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Tesla Model Y or the Nissan Murano cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Nissan Murano is cheaper, by about $40 a year for full coverage ($1,505 vs. $1,465) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Tesla Model Y and Nissan Murano?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 118 vs. 90 and comprehensive indices of 77 vs. 90 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.