Tesla Model Y vs Toyota 4Runner Insurance Cost

The Toyota 4Runner is cheaper to insure by about $210 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,505 vs. $1,295), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageTesla Model YToyota 4RunnerDifference
State minimum$530$535−$5
Standard (100/300/100)$770$775−$5
Full coverage$1,505$1,295+$210

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Model Y minus 4Runner.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorTesla Model YToyota 4Runner
SegmentMidsize SUVMidsize SUV
PowertrainsElectricGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)11874
HLDI comprehensive7773
HLDI property damage liability8288
HLDI bodily injury liability8376
NHTSA overall rating5★4★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)104

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Tesla Model Y has 44 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Model Y vs 4Runner insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverModel Y4Runner
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,135$3,560
Young adult (22)$2,405$2,070
Adult in their 30s$1,505$1,295
Adult in their 50s$1,385$1,190
Senior (72)$1,685$1,450
30s, one at-fault accident$2,180$1,875
30s, DUI on record$2,780$2,395

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Tesla Model Y or the Toyota 4Runner cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota 4Runner is cheaper, by about $210 a year for full coverage ($1,505 vs. $1,295) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Tesla Model Y and Toyota 4Runner?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 118 vs. 74 and comprehensive indices of 77 vs. 73 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.