Kia Sportage vs Mitsubishi Outlander Insurance Cost
The Kia Sportage is cheaper to insure by about $60 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,615 vs. $1,675), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Kia Sportage | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $620 | $655 | −$35 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $895 | $950 | −$55 |
| Full coverage | $1,615 | $1,675 | −$60 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Sportage minus Outlander.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Kia Sportage | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Small SUV | Small SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 109 | 116 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 96 | 103 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 100 | 107 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 113 | 125 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 2 | 2 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Mitsubishi Outlander has 7 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
Sportage vs Outlander insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Sportage | Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $4,445 | $4,605 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,585 | $2,680 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,615 | $1,675 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,485 | $1,540 |
| Senior (72) | $1,810 | $1,875 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,345 | $2,430 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,990 | $3,100 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Kia Sportage or the Mitsubishi Outlander cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Kia Sportage is cheaper, by about $60 a year for full coverage ($1,615 vs. $1,675) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Sportage and Mitsubishi Outlander?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 109 vs. 116 and comprehensive indices of 96 vs. 103 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.