Kia Niro vs Mitsubishi Outlander Insurance Cost
The Mitsubishi Outlander is cheaper to insure by about $50 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,725 vs. $1,675), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Kia Niro | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $695 | $655 | +$40 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $1,005 | $950 | +$55 |
| Full coverage | $1,725 | $1,675 | +$50 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Niro minus Outlander.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Kia Niro | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Small SUV | Small SUV |
| Powertrains | Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Electric | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 108 | 116 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 99 | 103 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 107 | 107 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 143 | 125 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 4★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 1 | 2 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Mitsubishi Outlander has 8 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
Niro vs Outlander insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Niro | Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $4,750 | $4,605 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,765 | $2,680 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,725 | $1,675 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,590 | $1,540 |
| Senior (72) | $1,935 | $1,875 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,505 | $2,430 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $3,195 | $3,100 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Kia Niro or the Mitsubishi Outlander cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Mitsubishi Outlander is cheaper, by about $50 a year for full coverage ($1,725 vs. $1,675) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Niro and Mitsubishi Outlander?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 108 vs. 116 and comprehensive indices of 99 vs. 103 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.