Kia Niro vs Mitsubishi Outlander Insurance Cost

The Mitsubishi Outlander is cheaper to insure by about $50 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,725 vs. $1,675), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageKia NiroMitsubishi OutlanderDifference
State minimum$695$655+$40
Standard (100/300/100)$1,005$950+$55
Full coverage$1,725$1,675+$50

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Niro minus Outlander.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorKia NiroMitsubishi Outlander
SegmentSmall SUVSmall SUV
PowertrainsHybrid, Plug-in hybrid, ElectricGasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)108116
HLDI comprehensive99103
HLDI property damage liability107107
HLDI bodily injury liability143125
NHTSA overall rating4★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)12

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Mitsubishi Outlander has 8 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Niro vs Outlander insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverNiroOutlander
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,750$4,605
Young adult (22)$2,765$2,680
Adult in their 30s$1,725$1,675
Adult in their 50s$1,590$1,540
Senior (72)$1,935$1,875
30s, one at-fault accident$2,505$2,430
30s, DUI on record$3,195$3,100

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Kia Niro or the Mitsubishi Outlander cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Mitsubishi Outlander is cheaper, by about $50 a year for full coverage ($1,725 vs. $1,675) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Niro and Mitsubishi Outlander?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 108 vs. 116 and comprehensive indices of 99 vs. 103 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.