Ford Escape vs Kia Niro Insurance Cost

The Ford Escape is cheaper to insure by about $100 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,625 vs. $1,725), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageFord EscapeKia NiroDifference
State minimum$705$695+$10
Standard (100/300/100)$1,020$1,005+$15
Full coverage$1,625$1,725−$100

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Escape minus Niro.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorFord EscapeKia Niro
SegmentSmall SUVSmall SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Flex-fuelHybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Electric
HLDI collision (100 = avg)95108
HLDI comprehensive8299
HLDI property damage liability116107
HLDI bodily injury liability143143
NHTSA overall rating5★4★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)171

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Kia Niro has 13 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Ford Escape.

Escape vs Niro insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverEscapeNiro
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,475$4,750
Young adult (22)$2,605$2,765
Adult in their 30s$1,625$1,725
Adult in their 50s$1,495$1,590
Senior (72)$1,820$1,935
30s, one at-fault accident$2,360$2,505
30s, DUI on record$3,010$3,195

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ford Escape or the Kia Niro cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Escape is cheaper, by about $100 a year for full coverage ($1,625 vs. $1,725) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Ford Escape and Kia Niro?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 95 vs. 108 and comprehensive indices of 82 vs. 99 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.