Kia Forte vs Nissan Sentra Insurance Cost
The Kia Forte is cheaper to insure by about $90 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,955 vs. $2,045), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Kia Forte | Nissan Sentra | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $860 | $855 | +$5 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $1,245 | $1,240 | +$5 |
| Full coverage | $1,955 | $2,045 | −$90 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Forte minus Sentra.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Kia Forte | Nissan Sentra |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Compact car | Compact car |
| Powertrains | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 128 | 132 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 108 | 91 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 141 | 140 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 188 | 192 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 4★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 4 | 5 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Sentra has 4 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Nissan Sentra.
Forte vs Sentra insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Forte | Sentra |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $5,380 | $5,625 |
| Young adult (22) | $3,130 | $3,270 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,955 | $2,045 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,800 | $1,880 |
| Senior (72) | $2,190 | $2,290 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,835 | $2,965 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $3,620 | $3,785 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Kia Forte or the Nissan Sentra cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Kia Forte is cheaper, by about $90 a year for full coverage ($1,955 vs. $2,045) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Forte and Nissan Sentra?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 128 vs. 132 and comprehensive indices of 108 vs. 91 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.