Kia Forte vs Hyundai Elantra Insurance Cost

The Hyundai Elantra is cheaper to insure by about $60 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,955 vs. $1,895), and cheaper in 47 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageKia ForteHyundai ElantraDifference
State minimum$860$745+$115
Standard (100/300/100)$1,245$1,080+$165
Full coverage$1,955$1,895+$60

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Forte minus Elantra.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorKia ForteHyundai Elantra
SegmentCompact carCompact car
PowertrainsGasolineGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)128134
HLDI comprehensive108109
HLDI property damage liability141120
HLDI bodily injury liability188151
NHTSA overall rating4★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10#1
Recalls (latest 3 model years)43

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Hyundai Elantra has 6 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Hyundai Elantra appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.

Forte vs Elantra insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverForteElantra
Teen driver (18, own policy)$5,380$5,215
Young adult (22)$3,130$3,035
Adult in their 30s$1,955$1,895
Adult in their 50s$1,800$1,745
Senior (72)$2,190$2,125
30s, one at-fault accident$2,835$2,750
30s, DUI on record$3,620$3,510

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Kia Forte or the Hyundai Elantra cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Hyundai Elantra is cheaper, by about $60 a year for full coverage ($1,955 vs. $1,895) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Forte and Hyundai Elantra?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 128 vs. 134 and comprehensive indices of 108 vs. 109 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.