Kia Forte vs Hyundai Elantra Insurance Cost
The Hyundai Elantra is cheaper to insure by about $60 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,955 vs. $1,895), and cheaper in 47 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Kia Forte | Hyundai Elantra | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $860 | $745 | +$115 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $1,245 | $1,080 | +$165 |
| Full coverage | $1,955 | $1,895 | +$60 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Forte minus Elantra.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Kia Forte | Hyundai Elantra |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Compact car | Compact car |
| Powertrains | Gasoline | Gasoline, Hybrid |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 128 | 134 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 108 | 109 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 141 | 120 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 188 | 151 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 4★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | #1 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 4 | 3 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Hyundai Elantra has 6 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Hyundai Elantra appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.
Forte vs Elantra insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Forte | Elantra |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $5,380 | $5,215 |
| Young adult (22) | $3,130 | $3,035 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,955 | $1,895 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,800 | $1,745 |
| Senior (72) | $2,190 | $2,125 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,835 | $2,750 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $3,620 | $3,510 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Kia Forte or the Hyundai Elantra cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Hyundai Elantra is cheaper, by about $60 a year for full coverage ($1,955 vs. $1,895) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Kia Forte and Hyundai Elantra?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 128 vs. 134 and comprehensive indices of 108 vs. 109 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.