GMC Terrain vs Ford Escape Insurance Cost
The GMC Terrain is cheaper to insure by about $145 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,480 vs. $1,625), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | GMC Terrain | Ford Escape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $610 | $705 | −$95 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $885 | $1,020 | −$135 |
| Full coverage | $1,480 | $1,625 | −$145 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Terrain minus Escape.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | GMC Terrain | Ford Escape |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Small SUV | Small SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline, Diesel, Flex-fuel | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Flex-fuel |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 85 | 95 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 81 | 82 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 90 | 116 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 115 | 143 |
| NHTSA overall rating | — | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 1 | 17 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Ford Escape has 10 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
Terrain vs Escape insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Terrain | Escape |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $4,070 | $4,475 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,370 | $2,605 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,480 | $1,625 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,360 | $1,495 |
| Senior (72) | $1,660 | $1,820 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,145 | $2,360 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,740 | $3,010 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the GMC Terrain or the Ford Escape cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the GMC Terrain is cheaper, by about $145 a year for full coverage ($1,480 vs. $1,625) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the GMC Terrain and Ford Escape?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 85 vs. 95 and comprehensive indices of 81 vs. 82 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.