GMC Terrain vs Ford Escape Insurance Cost

The GMC Terrain is cheaper to insure by about $145 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,480 vs. $1,625), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageGMC TerrainFord EscapeDifference
State minimum$610$705−$95
Standard (100/300/100)$885$1,020−$135
Full coverage$1,480$1,625−$145

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Terrain minus Escape.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorGMC TerrainFord Escape
SegmentSmall SUVSmall SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Diesel, Flex-fuelGasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Flex-fuel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)8595
HLDI comprehensive8182
HLDI property damage liability90116
HLDI bodily injury liability115143
NHTSA overall rating—5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)117

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Ford Escape has 10 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Terrain vs Escape insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverTerrainEscape
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,070$4,475
Young adult (22)$2,370$2,605
Adult in their 30s$1,480$1,625
Adult in their 50s$1,360$1,495
Senior (72)$1,660$1,820
30s, one at-fault accident$2,145$2,360
30s, DUI on record$2,740$3,010

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the GMC Terrain or the Ford Escape cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the GMC Terrain is cheaper, by about $145 a year for full coverage ($1,480 vs. $1,625) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the GMC Terrain and Ford Escape?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 85 vs. 95 and comprehensive indices of 81 vs. 82 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.