Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Audi RS 7 Insurance Cost
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is cheaper to insure by about $170 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($2,275 vs. $2,445), and cheaper in 50 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Alfa Romeo Giulia | Audi RS 7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $750 | $600 | +$150 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $1,085 | $870 | +$215 |
| Full coverage | $2,275 | $2,445 | −$170 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Giulia minus RS 7.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Alfa Romeo Giulia | Audi RS 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Luxury car | Luxury car |
| Powertrains | Gasoline | Gasoline, Hybrid |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 186 | 243 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 182 | 270 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 138 | — |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | — | — |
| NHTSA overall rating | — | — |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 4 | 1 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Audi RS 7 has 57 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Giulia vs RS 7 insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Giulia | RS 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $6,255 | $6,725 |
| Young adult (22) | $3,640 | $3,910 |
| Adult in their 30s | $2,275 | $2,445 |
| Adult in their 50s | $2,090 | $2,250 |
| Senior (72) | $2,545 | $2,740 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $3,295 | $3,545 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $4,205 | $4,525 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Alfa Romeo Giulia or the Audi RS 7 cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Alfa Romeo Giulia is cheaper, by about $170 a year for full coverage ($2,275 vs. $2,445) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Alfa Romeo Giulia and Audi RS 7?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 186 vs. 243 and comprehensive indices of 182 vs. 270 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.