Mazda MX-5 Miata vs Nissan GT-R Insurance Cost

The Mazda MX-5 Miata is cheaper to insure by about $495 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,280 vs. $1,775), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageMazda MX-5 MiataNissan GT-RDifference
State minimum$485$690−$205
Standard (100/300/100)$705$995−$290
Full coverage$1,280$1,775−$495

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = MX-5 Miata minus GT-R.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorMazda MX-5 MiataNissan GT-R
SegmentSports carSports car
PowertrainsGasolineGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)83—
HLDI comprehensive69—
HLDI property damage liability51—
HLDI bodily injury liability63—
NHTSA overall rating——
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)11

MX-5 Miata vs GT-R insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverMX-5 MiataGT-R
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,515$4,880
Young adult (22)$2,045$2,840
Adult in their 30s$1,280$1,775
Adult in their 50s$1,175$1,635
Senior (72)$1,430$1,990
30s, one at-fault accident$1,855$2,575
30s, DUI on record$2,365$3,285

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Mazda MX-5 Miata or the Nissan GT-R cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Mazda MX-5 Miata is cheaper, by about $495 a year for full coverage ($1,280 vs. $1,775) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Mazda MX-5 Miata and Nissan GT-R?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 83 vs. n/a and comprehensive indices of 69 vs. n/a (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.