Mazda CX-5 vs Hyundai Tucson Insurance Cost
The Mazda CX-5 is cheaper to insure by about $85 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,325 vs. $1,410), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Mazda CX-5 | Hyundai Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $550 | $565 | −$15 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $795 | $820 | −$25 |
| Full coverage | $1,325 | $1,410 | −$85 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = CX-5 minus Tucson.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Mazda CX-5 | Hyundai Tucson |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Small SUV | Small SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline, Diesel | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Hydrogen fuel cell |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 80 | 94 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 71 | 76 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 96 | 92 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 79 | 92 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 0 | 12 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Hyundai Tucson has 14 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
CX-5 vs Tucson insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | CX-5 | Tucson |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $3,645 | $3,880 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,120 | $2,260 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,325 | $1,410 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,220 | $1,300 |
| Senior (72) | $1,485 | $1,580 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $1,920 | $2,045 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,450 | $2,610 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mazda CX-5 or the Hyundai Tucson cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Mazda CX-5 is cheaper, by about $85 a year for full coverage ($1,325 vs. $1,410) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Mazda CX-5 and Hyundai Tucson?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 80 vs. 94 and comprehensive indices of 71 vs. 76 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.