Ford Ranger vs Jeep Gladiator Insurance Cost

The Ford Ranger is cheaper to insure by about $360 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,275 vs. $1,635), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageFord RangerJeep GladiatorDifference
State minimum$505$765−$260
Standard (100/300/100)$730$1,110−$380
Full coverage$1,275$1,635−$360

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Ranger minus Gladiator.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorFord RangerJeep Gladiator
SegmentPickup truckPickup truck
PowertrainsGasolineGasoline, Diesel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)8063
HLDI comprehensive7584
HLDI property damage liability70155
HLDI bodily injury liability—127
NHTSA overall rating4★—
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)233

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Ford Ranger has 17 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Ranger vs Gladiator insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverRangerGladiator
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,510$4,490
Young adult (22)$2,045$2,615
Adult in their 30s$1,275$1,635
Adult in their 50s$1,175$1,505
Senior (72)$1,430$1,830
30s, one at-fault accident$1,850$2,370
30s, DUI on record$2,360$3,020

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ford Ranger or the Jeep Gladiator cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Ranger is cheaper, by about $360 a year for full coverage ($1,275 vs. $1,635) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Ford Ranger and Jeep Gladiator?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 80 vs. 63 and comprehensive indices of 75 vs. 84 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.