Nissan Frontier vs Ford Ranger Insurance Cost

The Ford Ranger is cheaper to insure by about $205 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,480 vs. $1,275), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageNissan FrontierFord RangerDifference
State minimum$590$505+$85
Standard (100/300/100)$855$730+$125
Full coverage$1,480$1,275+$205

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Frontier minus Ranger.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorNissan FrontierFord Ranger
SegmentPickup truckPickup truck
PowertrainsGasoline, Flex-fuelGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)9280
HLDI comprehensive7775
HLDI property damage liability9470
HLDI bodily injury liability93—
NHTSA overall rating4★4★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)323

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Nissan Frontier has 12 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Frontier vs Ranger insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverFrontierRanger
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,070$3,510
Young adult (22)$2,365$2,045
Adult in their 30s$1,480$1,275
Adult in their 50s$1,360$1,175
Senior (72)$1,655$1,430
30s, one at-fault accident$2,145$1,850
30s, DUI on record$2,735$2,360

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Nissan Frontier or the Ford Ranger cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Ranger is cheaper, by about $205 a year for full coverage ($1,480 vs. $1,275) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Nissan Frontier and Ford Ranger?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 92 vs. 80 and comprehensive indices of 77 vs. 75 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.