Chevrolet Tahoe vs GMC Yukon Insurance Cost

The GMC Yukon is cheaper to insure by about $135 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,450 vs. $1,315), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageChevrolet TahoeGMC YukonDifference
State minimum$595$540+$55
Standard (100/300/100)$860$785+$75
Full coverage$1,450$1,315+$135

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Tahoe minus Yukon.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorChevrolet TahoeGMC Yukon
SegmentLarge SUVLarge SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Diesel, Flex-fuelGasoline, Hybrid, Diesel, Flex-fuel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)7966
HLDI comprehensive7975
HLDI property damage liability10783
HLDI bodily injury liability8682
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)34

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Chevrolet Tahoe has 13 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Tahoe vs Yukon insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverTahoeYukon
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,985$3,615
Young adult (22)$2,320$2,105
Adult in their 30s$1,450$1,315
Adult in their 50s$1,335$1,210
Senior (72)$1,620$1,470
30s, one at-fault accident$2,100$1,905
30s, DUI on record$2,680$2,430

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Chevrolet Tahoe or the GMC Yukon cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the GMC Yukon is cheaper, by about $135 a year for full coverage ($1,450 vs. $1,315) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 79 vs. 66 and comprehensive indices of 79 vs. 75 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.