Chevrolet Tahoe vs GMC Yukon Insurance Cost
The GMC Yukon is cheaper to insure by about $135 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,450 vs. $1,315), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Chevrolet Tahoe | GMC Yukon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $595 | $540 | +$55 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $860 | $785 | +$75 |
| Full coverage | $1,450 | $1,315 | +$135 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Tahoe minus Yukon.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Chevrolet Tahoe | GMC Yukon |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Large SUV | Large SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline, Hybrid, Diesel, Flex-fuel | Gasoline, Hybrid, Diesel, Flex-fuel |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 79 | 66 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 79 | 75 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 107 | 83 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 86 | 82 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 3 | 4 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Chevrolet Tahoe has 13 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.
Tahoe vs Yukon insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Tahoe | Yukon |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $3,985 | $3,615 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,320 | $2,105 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,450 | $1,315 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,335 | $1,210 |
| Senior (72) | $1,620 | $1,470 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,100 | $1,905 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,680 | $2,430 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Chevrolet Tahoe or the GMC Yukon cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the GMC Yukon is cheaper, by about $135 a year for full coverage ($1,450 vs. $1,315) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 79 vs. 66 and comprehensive indices of 79 vs. 75 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.