BMW X6 vs Mercedes-Benz G-Class Insurance Cost

The BMW X6 is cheaper to insure by about $255 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($2,305 vs. $2,560), and cheaper in 50 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageBMW X6Mercedes-Benz G-ClassDifference
State minimum$680$550+$130
Standard (100/300/100)$985$800+$185
Full coverage$2,305$2,560−$255

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = X6 minus G-Class.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorBMW X6Mercedes-Benz G-Class
SegmentLuxury SUVLuxury SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline, Hybrid, Electric
HLDI collision (100 = avg)198184
HLDI comprehensive195439
HLDI property damage liability12486
HLDI bodily injury liability117—
NHTSA overall rating——
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)63

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the BMW X6 has 14 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the BMW X6.

X6 vs G-Class insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverX6G-Class
Teen driver (18, own policy)$6,335$7,035
Young adult (22)$3,685$4,090
Adult in their 30s$2,305$2,560
Adult in their 50s$2,120$2,355
Senior (72)$2,580$2,865
30s, one at-fault accident$3,340$3,710
30s, DUI on record$4,260$4,730

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the BMW X6 or the Mercedes-Benz G-Class cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the BMW X6 is cheaper, by about $255 a year for full coverage ($2,305 vs. $2,560) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the BMW X6 and Mercedes-Benz G-Class?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 198 vs. 184 and comprehensive indices of 195 vs. 439 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.