Lamborghini Urus vs BMW X6 Insurance Cost

The BMW X6 is cheaper to insure by about $1,585 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($3,890 vs. $2,305), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageLamborghini UrusBMW X6Difference
State minimum$580$680−$100
Standard (100/300/100)$845$985−$140
Full coverage$3,890$2,305+$1,585

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Urus minus X6.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorLamborghini UrusBMW X6
SegmentLuxury SUVLuxury SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Plug-in hybridGasoline, Hybrid
HLDI collision (100 = avg)477198
HLDI comprehensive577195
HLDI property damage liability94124
HLDI bodily injury liability—117
NHTSA overall rating——
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)36

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Lamborghini Urus has 279 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the BMW X6.

Urus vs X6 insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverUrusX6
Teen driver (18, own policy)$10,700$6,335
Young adult (22)$6,225$3,685
Adult in their 30s$3,890$2,305
Adult in their 50s$3,580$2,120
Senior (72)$4,360$2,580
30s, one at-fault accident$5,640$3,340
30s, DUI on record$7,200$4,260

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Lamborghini Urus or the BMW X6 cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the BMW X6 is cheaper, by about $1,585 a year for full coverage ($3,890 vs. $2,305) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Lamborghini Urus and BMW X6?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 477 vs. 198 and comprehensive indices of 577 vs. 195 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.