Tesla Model 3 vs Volkswagen Jetta Insurance Cost

The Tesla Model 3 is cheaper to insure by about $25 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,670 vs. $1,695), and cheaper in 31 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageTesla Model 3Volkswagen JettaDifference
State minimum$590$705−$115
Standard (100/300/100)$855$1,020−$165
Full coverage$1,670$1,695−$25

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Model 3 minus Jetta.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorTesla Model 3Volkswagen Jetta
SegmentMidsize carMidsize car
PowertrainsElectricGasoline, Hybrid, Diesel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)133103
HLDI comprehensive8783
HLDI property damage liability98118
HLDI bodily injury liability91132
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)42

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Tesla Model 3 has 30 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Model 3 vs Jetta insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverModel 3Jetta
Teen driver (18, own policy)$4,595$4,670
Young adult (22)$2,675$2,715
Adult in their 30s$1,670$1,695
Adult in their 50s$1,535$1,560
Senior (72)$1,870$1,900
30s, one at-fault accident$2,425$2,460
30s, DUI on record$3,090$3,140

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Tesla Model 3 or the Volkswagen Jetta cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Tesla Model 3 is cheaper, by about $25 a year for full coverage ($1,670 vs. $1,695) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Tesla Model 3 and Volkswagen Jetta?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 133 vs. 103 and comprehensive indices of 87 vs. 83 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.