Mercedes-Benz C-Class vs Audi S5 Insurance Cost

The Audi S5 is cheaper to insure by about $220 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($2,050 vs. $1,830), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageMercedes-Benz C-ClassAudi S5Difference
State minimum$655$480+$175
Standard (100/300/100)$945$695+$250
Full coverage$2,050$1,830+$220

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = C-Class minus S5.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorMercedes-Benz C-ClassAudi S5
SegmentLuxury carLuxury car
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Flex-fuelGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)161177
HLDI comprehensive160145
HLDI property damage liability10965
HLDI bodily injury liability115—
NHTSA overall rating——
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)22

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Audi S5 has 16 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Audi S5.

C-Class vs S5 insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverC-ClassS5
Teen driver (18, own policy)$5,630$5,030
Young adult (22)$3,275$2,925
Adult in their 30s$2,050$1,830
Adult in their 50s$1,885$1,685
Senior (72)$2,295$2,050
30s, one at-fault accident$2,970$2,655
30s, DUI on record$3,790$3,385

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Mercedes-Benz C-Class or the Audi S5 cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Audi S5 is cheaper, by about $220 a year for full coverage ($2,050 vs. $1,830) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and Audi S5?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 161 vs. 177 and comprehensive indices of 160 vs. 145 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.