Hyundai Sonata vs Kia K5 Insurance Cost
The Hyundai Sonata is cheaper to insure by about $115 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,890 vs. $2,005), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Hyundai Sonata | Kia K5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $695 | $760 | −$65 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $1,005 | $1,100 | −$95 |
| Full coverage | $1,890 | $2,005 | −$115 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Sonata minus K5.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Hyundai Sonata | Kia K5 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Midsize car | Midsize car |
| Powertrains | Gasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid | Gasoline |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 136 | 144 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 116 | 116 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 112 | 125 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 133 | 155 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | #3 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 1 | 3 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Kia K5 has 8 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Hyundai Sonata appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.
Sonata vs K5 insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | Sonata | K5 |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $5,195 | $5,515 |
| Young adult (22) | $3,025 | $3,210 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,890 | $2,005 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,740 | $1,845 |
| Senior (72) | $2,115 | $2,245 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,740 | $2,910 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $3,495 | $3,710 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Hyundai Sonata or the Kia K5 cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Hyundai Sonata is cheaper, by about $115 a year for full coverage ($1,890 vs. $2,005) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Hyundai Sonata and Kia K5?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 136 vs. 144 and comprehensive indices of 116 vs. 116 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.