Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4 Insurance Cost

The Honda CR-V is cheaper to insure by about $85 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,200 vs. $1,285), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageHonda CR-VToyota RAV4Difference
State minimum$495$550−$55
Standard (100/300/100)$720$800−$80
Full coverage$1,200$1,285−$85

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = CR-V minus RAV4.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorHonda CR-VToyota RAV4
SegmentSmall SUVSmall SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Hydrogen fuel cellGasoline, Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid, Electric
HLDI collision (100 = avg)6372
HLDI comprehensive6562
HLDI property damage liability6683
HLDI bodily injury liability8094
NHTSA overall rating5★5★
NICB most-stolen rank#9Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)56

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Toyota RAV4 has 9 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Honda CR-V appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.

CR-V vs RAV4 insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCR-VRAV4
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,305$3,530
Young adult (22)$1,920$2,055
Adult in their 30s$1,200$1,285
Adult in their 50s$1,105$1,180
Senior (72)$1,345$1,435
30s, one at-fault accident$1,740$1,860
30s, DUI on record$2,220$2,375

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Honda CR-V or the Toyota RAV4 cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Honda CR-V is cheaper, by about $85 a year for full coverage ($1,200 vs. $1,285) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 63 vs. 72 and comprehensive indices of 65 vs. 62 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.