Honda CR-V vs Jeep Compass Insurance Cost

The Honda CR-V is cheaper to insure by about $380 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,200 vs. $1,580), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageHonda CR-VJeep CompassDifference
State minimum$495$740−$245
Standard (100/300/100)$720$1,070−$350
Full coverage$1,200$1,580−$380

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = CR-V minus Compass.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorHonda CR-VJeep Compass
SegmentSmall SUVSmall SUV
PowertrainsGasoline, Hybrid, Hydrogen fuel cellGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)6381
HLDI comprehensive6560
HLDI property damage liability66129
HLDI bodily injury liability80145
NHTSA overall rating5★4★
NICB most-stolen rank#9Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)51

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Jeep Compass has 18 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Honda CR-V appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.

CR-V vs Compass insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverCR-VCompass
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,305$4,350
Young adult (22)$1,920$2,530
Adult in their 30s$1,200$1,580
Adult in their 50s$1,105$1,455
Senior (72)$1,345$1,770
30s, one at-fault accident$1,740$2,295
30s, DUI on record$2,220$2,925

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Honda CR-V or the Jeep Compass cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Honda CR-V is cheaper, by about $380 a year for full coverage ($1,200 vs. $1,580) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Honda CR-V and Jeep Compass?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 63 vs. 81 and comprehensive indices of 65 vs. 60 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.