Ford Mustang vs Toyota GR86 Insurance Cost

The Ford Mustang is cheaper to insure by about $230 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,865 vs. $2,095), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageFord MustangToyota GR86Difference
State minimum$565$670−$105
Standard (100/300/100)$820$970−$150
Full coverage$1,865$2,095−$230

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Mustang minus GR86.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorFord MustangToyota GR86
SegmentSports carSports car
PowertrainsGasolineGasoline
HLDI collision (100 = avg)184191
HLDI comprehensive115116
HLDI property damage liability81102
HLDI bodily injury liability—112
NHTSA overall rating5★—
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10Not in top 10
Recalls (latest 3 model years)181

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Toyota GR86 has 7 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average.

Mustang vs GR86 insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverMustangGR86
Teen driver (18, own policy)$5,125$5,755
Young adult (22)$2,980$3,350
Adult in their 30s$1,865$2,095
Adult in their 50s$1,715$1,925
Senior (72)$2,085$2,345
30s, one at-fault accident$2,700$3,035
30s, DUI on record$3,445$3,870

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Ford Mustang or the Toyota GR86 cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Ford Mustang is cheaper, by about $230 a year for full coverage ($1,865 vs. $2,095) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Ford Mustang and Toyota GR86?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 184 vs. 191 and comprehensive indices of 115 vs. 116 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.