Cadillac XT5 vs Audi Q3 Insurance Cost
The Cadillac XT5 is cheaper to insure by about $35 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,405 vs. $1,440), and cheaper in 49 of 51 states.
Side-by-side insurance estimate
| Coverage | Cadillac XT5 | Audi Q3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| State minimum | $560 | $515 | +$45 |
| Standard (100/300/100) | $810 | $745 | +$65 |
| Full coverage | $1,405 | $1,440 | −$35 |
National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = XT5 minus Q3.
Why one costs more to insure
| Factor | Cadillac XT5 | Audi Q3 |
|---|---|---|
| Segment | Luxury SUV | Luxury SUV |
| Powertrains | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| HLDI collision (100 = avg) | 86 | 97 |
| HLDI comprehensive | 69 | 85 |
| HLDI property damage liability | 93 | 84 |
| HLDI bodily injury liability | 86 | 71 |
| NHTSA overall rating | 5★ | 5★ |
| NICB most-stolen rank | Not in top 10 | Not in top 10 |
| Recalls (latest 3 model years) | 3 | 2 |
Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Audi Q3 has 11 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. Comprehensive losses (theft, weather, glass) also favor the Cadillac XT5.
XT5 vs Q3 insurance by state
By driver profile (full coverage)
| Driver | XT5 | Q3 |
|---|---|---|
| Teen driver (18, own policy) | $3,860 | $3,965 |
| Young adult (22) | $2,245 | $2,310 |
| Adult in their 30s | $1,405 | $1,440 |
| Adult in their 50s | $1,290 | $1,325 |
| Senior (72) | $1,570 | $1,615 |
| 30s, one at-fault accident | $2,035 | $2,090 |
| 30s, DUI on record | $2,595 | $2,670 |
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is the Cadillac XT5 or the Audi Q3 cheaper to insure?
By our estimate the Cadillac XT5 is cheaper, by about $35 a year for full coverage ($1,405 vs. $1,440) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.
Why does insurance cost differ between the Cadillac XT5 and Audi Q3?
Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 86 vs. 97 and comprehensive indices of 69 vs. 85 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.
How we estimate this
We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.