Toyota Tacoma vs Ford F-150 Insurance Cost

The Toyota Tacoma is cheaper to insure by about $205 a year for full coverage by our estimate ($1,375 vs. $1,580), and cheaper in 51 of 51 states.

These are estimates, not quotes. Figures are modeled from public data (NAIC, Census, FEMA, IIHS/HLDI) for comparison only. Your actual premium depends on your insurer, driving history, vehicle and coverage choices. We are not an insurance company or agency. How we estimate

Side-by-side insurance estimate

CoverageToyota TacomaFord F-150Difference
State minimum$535$665−$130
Standard (100/300/100)$780$960−$180
Full coverage$1,375$1,580−$205

National average base rates, driver in their 30s with a clean record, latest model year of each car. Difference = Tacoma minus F-150.

Why one costs more to insure

FactorToyota TacomaFord F-150
SegmentPickup truckPickup truck
PowertrainsGasoline, HybridGasoline, Hybrid, Diesel, Flex-fuel
HLDI collision (100 = avg)8792
HLDI comprehensive8684
HLDI property damage liability73110
HLDI bodily injury liability85121
NHTSA overall rating4★5★
NICB most-stolen rankNot in top 10#7
Recalls (latest 3 model years)723

Collision losses are the biggest swing factor: the Ford F-150 has 5 points higher relative collision losses, meaning its crash repairs cost insurers more on average. The Ford F-150 appears on the NICB most-stolen list, adding to comprehensive costs.

Tacoma vs F-150 insurance by state

By driver profile (full coverage)

DriverTacomaF-150
Teen driver (18, own policy)$3,775$4,345
Young adult (22)$2,195$2,530
Adult in their 30s$1,375$1,580
Adult in their 50s$1,265$1,455
Senior (72)$1,535$1,770
30s, one at-fault accident$1,990$2,290
30s, DUI on record$2,540$2,925

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is the Toyota Tacoma or the Ford F-150 cheaper to insure?

By our estimate the Toyota Tacoma is cheaper, by about $205 a year for full coverage ($1,375 vs. $1,580) for a driver in their 30s with a clean record.

Why does insurance cost differ between the Toyota Tacoma and Ford F-150?

Mostly because of insurance-loss history: HLDI collision indices of 87 vs. 92 and comprehensive indices of 86 vs. 84 (100 = average), plus repair costs, theft rates and segment.

How we estimate this

We start from the state's average liability, collision and comprehensive premiums published by the NAIC, then apply a location factor (population density and commute time from the Census ACS, weather hazard scores from FEMA's National Risk Index), a vehicle factor (HLDI insurance-loss data where available, otherwise vehicle segment), and a driver-profile multiplier. Results are rounded ranges for comparison, not quotes. Read the full methodology.